‑ the Heads of the Group of Seven (G7) gather in Hiroshima this week, one of only two sites to witness the catastrophic consequences of nuclear weapons use in conflict, over 200 leaders and experts from 50 states warn of the need to compartmentalise nuclear arms control from great power competition. “On the Nature of Military Theory,” Lutes, Charles D., Hays, Peter et al. Clausewitz on Space War: An Essay on the Strategic Aspects of Military Operations in Space. Fort Leavenworth: School of Advanced Military Studies, United States Army Command and General Staff College, 2011. Space Power: A Theory for Sustaining US Security Through the Information Age. “Old Thoughts, New Problems: Mahan and the Consideration of Spacepower,” Lutes, Charles D., Hays, Peter et al. “International Relations Theory and Spacepower,” Lutes, Charles D., Hays, Peter et al. “The changing geopolitics of space activities.” Space Policy vol. Colorado Springs: US Air Force Academy, 1999. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2008. Strategic Restraint and the Pursuit of National Interests. “Space Power: A Unique Military Asset.” International Affairs Review. On Space Warfare: A Space Power Doctrine. Space Warfare: Strategy, Principles and Policy. “Towards a Theory of Space Power.” Space Policy vol. “European Union Space Initiatives: the Political Will for Increasing European Space Power.” Astropolitics vol. The Future of War: Power, Technology, and American World Dominance in the 21st Century. Maxwell AFB: Air University Press, 2006.įriedman, George and Meredith. Washington DC: National Defense University National War College, 2000.įredriksson, Brian E. Mahan’s Elements of Sea Power Applied to the Development of Space Power. Washington DC: National Defense University National War College, 2000.įrance, Martin E. Some Principles of Space Strategy (or ‘Corbett in Orbit). London and Portland: Frank Cass Publishers, 2002.įox, John G. Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age. “Space and Deterrence.” Astropolitics vol.7, no. Maxwell AFB: Air University Press, 1992.Ĭoletta, Damon. As a result, the article concludes that a comprehensive space power theory has not been formulated yet, and poses an academic challenge to IR theorists.īaucom, Donald R. Moltz, as well as a critical analysis of them in the context of IR. The article contains a review of basic theoretical attempts made by David E. The main assumption of the article is that space power theories in their current form should be perceived rather as tailor‑made doctrines formulated for strategic and political purposes, and not new IR theories, because they have many deficiencies. Starting with the statement that space systems and space exploitation are becoming an increasingly important factor for states and non‑state actors, the article seeks to explore if current space power theories meet the requirements of the changing reality. space power theories formulated by eminent military strategists and analysts with reference to International Relations theories.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |